Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel David Mendelssohn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel David Mendelssohn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced Rathfelder (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:03, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No refs, no cites. No option but delete. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete It would be impossible to prove anything in this article, as there are no sources. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 07:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article constitutes an automatic pass of our notability standards for either politicians or political scientists — he has held no political office that passes WP:NPOL, and making a person a notable political scientist hinges on showing evidence of his notability as a political scientist and not just saying the words "one of the most notable political scientists". The matter of whether he qualifies for an article or not, accordingly, depends on reliably sourcing him over WP:GNG, not just stating that he exists — but there are no sources here, and there's no article in the German Wikipedia (where I'd expect a genuinely notable German political scientist to be covered) to check for other sourcing either. Bearcat (talk) 12:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.